who wants to hear a theory? of course you do! i just asked to be polite okay let's go
the slightly weird characterisations of quite a few major characters in the witcher games (mainly triss, yen, and philippa) are because the games are from triss' perspective.
yeah, we see the world from geralt's eyes with dandelion's narration, but the world itself is made by how triss sees it. that's why her relationship with geralt seems a lot less icky, even though the dynamic is exactly the same shit show from the saga. yen's negative qualities are massively played up, especially her byronic hero associated flaws (which makes triss' girl-next-door charms seem even more irresistible).
but WAIT. there's more.
triss' friends/lovers/allies come off a lot better than in the books. philippa's plots work out much more, and her conniving bitch aura and chronic backstabbing syndrome are reduced to power-hunger and cynical sarcasm. keira is way more put together (which is definitely saying something), and she gets a ton of second chances to redeem herself. foltest is shown as a good king who makes bad choices, but they're for the greater good. even his armor in the first game has very strong noble/chivalrous/totally-didn't-have-a-demon-baby-with-my-sister vibes







